Search for: "THE BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO, NEW JERSEY" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2007, 12:06 pm
Today, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued its unanimous opinion in Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 10:30 am
Supreme Court sides with Gloucester County man in eminent domain case": The Philadelphia Inquirer provides a news update that begins, "In a decision that could make it harder for towns around the state to seize land, the New Jersey Supreme Court this morning sided with a Paulsboro landowner who had argued that the Gloucester County borough could not seize his land merely because it was vacant. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 11:35 pm
Borough of Paulsboro, 924 A.2d 447 (N.J. 2007), which held that "blight" means more than "not fully productive. [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:08 pm by Michael Bruno
Borough of Paulsboro, marked the swinging of the pendulum against the use of eminent domain in the redevelopment context in New Jersey. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:49 pm by Brad Schnure
Senator Jennifer Beck (R-Monmouth) will hold a press conference with representatives from ten school districts that are among the most underfunded in New Jersey to push for additional state funding. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
Borough of Paulsboro, New Jersey has joined that trend.The Gallenthin family has owned an undeveloped parcel of land in Paulsboro since 1952. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:24 am
Borough of Paulsboro, 191 N.J. 344 (2007) case and the ERETC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:11 am by Paul M. Hauge
Borough of Paulsboro, which held that the New Jersey Constitution requires a finding of actual blight before private property may be taken for purposes of redevelopment. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:33 am by Bill Ward
Borough of Paulsboro, where the New Jersey Supreme Court reined in the definition of “blighted” property. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:01 pm
Borough of Paulsboro, 924 A.2d 447 (2007) (New Jersey) - blight means more than "not fully productive" Public use challenges not subject to Williamson County ripeness rules - Rumber v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Bill Ward
Unlike the New York State Court of Appeals in Kaur, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Gallenthin did not grant “blind deference” to the Borough of Paulsboro’s designation of a 60 acre parcel of undeveloped wetlands as “blighted. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 12:43 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court in Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:55 am by Jon L. Gelman
Similarly, the levels of PFNA found in the nearby Borough of Paulsboro’s water supply in 2014 were higher than had ever been reported in drinking water elsewhere in the United States or the world. [read post]